|
Edited by IseN on 03/07/12 18:28 (BST)
Wonder if Zergs will still be saying its fine its fine when its only P and Z left in the ladder,
by the rate at which high level Terrans are changing race this game going to be alot more boring in the not to distant future. |
Wonder if Zergs will still be saying its fine its fine when its only P and Z left in the ladder, Can you link your source please? I'd love to see those statistics. |
|
Edited by IseN on 03/07/12 20:36 (BST)
Wonder if Zergs will still be saying its fine its fine when its only P and Z left in the ladder, Go starcraft 2 Ranks check GM league, Terran is down by almost half within the last few months, where GM league used to have around 33% Terran now its more like 19%. So a few patches has wiped out almost half the Terrans in GM league, nice balance we got going there. |
Grandmaster (1,028 players)
|
|
Edited by IseN on 03/07/12 22:19 (BST)
Go starcraft 2 Ranks check GM league, Terran is down by almost half within the last few months, where GM league used to have around 33% Terran now its more like 19%. Seems to have gone up, still from 33% to 24% in a couple of patches is not fine. The figure is also being carryed by Koreans who all micro like MKP, its worse in EU/NA. Also what about the impact less Terran in ladder is having on the actual fun of the game for everyone? |
|
Well lately most opponents I face are T honestly. But on the previous page I posted a link to the latest Day[9] daily, I suggest Terrans too watch that as it gives a good overview about what to do in the late game vs BL/Infestor, since the new patch.
|
19% is for EU ladder, 24% for ladder in general. |
Yeah so? You need to look at the international scene if you want too look at such statistics as one region doesn't give you the overview about how race distribution, balance etc really is. And when I look at these statistics I can only come to the conclusion that, although there are less Terran at the highest level, their play is very solid. |
|
Edited by IseN on 03/07/12 22:34 (BST)
Fundamental Problem, ghost is too expensive and weak for what it is supposed to do , counter infestors. If we had the original EMP radius and put ghosts back 150/150 then we have a more balanced lategame TVZ. Only other solution is too buff the Raven, right now the lategame is not balanced and our early game where we need to take out some drones to stay even with Zerg has been severley crippled with Queen buff. So we are forced to play a macro game where the Zerg is always ahead because Terran needs to pressure and Zerg can have the defenders advantage on creep which seems to spread twice as fast as it did before. Even an overlord can deny Terran base for like 1minuite because the creep recedes far too slowly this is completley ridiculas, since Zerg can now spread creep faster they should make it clear faster when we destroy it. We have allready wasted scans but we still have to wait like 5 minuites for the creep to go. |
just watch the daily...... T is, in TvZ lategame, in the same position as Zerg is in ZvP late-game. There is no way too directly engage the Z army, unless you really outplay your opponent. The only way is too avoid the army and attack the vulnerable spots, which means you need too know the armies position. And that daily I posted should be a great help with that. |
The Zerg army is not the problem, Terran ultimate army can completley crush it. The problem is Zerg is ahead all game because of the Queen change EVEN if Terran takes a super fast 3rd. Also Terran can just die to roach bane allin if we take a fast 3rd, and Zerg can take a 3rd and easily hold a Terran 2 base allin. |
How does having the lowest representation translate to terran being very solid? If terran is solid at 24%, what does that make P an Z? More than very solid? Extremely solid? Having the worst stats does not mean a race is solid. It means the oposite: the race sucks. |
Only if unscouted.
Only if scouted. See a pattern emerge? Go watch that daily, then come back with your opinions. Don't whine mindlessly. |
Have you looked at all stats instead of only the distribution? |
Which side cant engage in direct fight in PvZ? |
|
ZVT is amazing because you have to let zerg get up to 70 drones becaue queend fend of pushes, all of the new maps are overlord friendly(cloud kindom is a joke when it comes down to this but who cares... as long as zerg is doing good the game is balanced')
The third is soo easy to get which means that long macro games are mor likely to happen and as we know terran late game consists of tier 1 units -_-. But i mean all zergs have the same attitude - If im winning the game is balanced and others need to l2p, if im loosing the game is obv imbalanced...And you bunch of whiners, idiots are complaining about zvp? i am a terran, i got a new account just to play zerg, after 50 games i am mid diamond level zerg and zvp is one of the easiest matchups, i just do the stephano roach play and win almost every game, the game seems like a joke when you are playing zerg, sadly though terran is just so much more fun, even though that sometimes you loose to opponents that dont have an idea about the game. |
|
Edited by UnitedTrolls on 04/07/12 07:44 (BST)
You still have Terran as most games played with 58 wins... WHAT ARE YOU PLAYING AT? |
|
Why is it that terran's third is vulnerable to a roach ling all in but zerg's is not?
Hint: 4 hellions doesn't constitute an all in. Also ridiculous comments in this thread: All korean Terrans micro like MVP and still only 24% representation Any proof? Nah, but it sure does back up your arguments well doesn't it. |
