World of Warcraft®

For those who may of missed it winning TB as the attacker now grants 1800 (my 0 key dint get stuck ) that's 1800 hounor , so as a defender its probibly in evrybody's interest to loose evry time so as alliance gets the 1800 hounor than horde gets the 1800 hounor alternating evry battle ...... not sugesting win trading but yeah getting hounor caped multiple times a day sounds like a good idea .... so ... yeah , just saying :)

Sounds like a really good idea :D

Yes, it does indeed dear sir!

OMG! What a good idea

It is a very good idea, let's hope people have enough sense to make it happen.

Yeah!

We just gave alliance TB!

Now pay back later today :)

Any Alliance who read this post and realise its the best idea for us all to have a turn at BH raid and also be hounor caped multiple times a day please , please , please tell your freinds and guild mates so as they understand . Horde already seem to understand its the best thing by far to do so make sure alliance do aswell and PROFIT !!

good idea - would hope it takes off - because the honor grind in BGs is stupid.

Like this yesterday for me:

24 minute queue - 20 minute game, 34 killing blows, 2 flag returns 1 flag capture - seriously tough (fair and fun match) - I think everyone had a good time (even the loosing side) - you know, one of THOSE matches where you breath deeply at the end and think - THAT's how BGs should be.

A win, and I walk away with 79 honor, yes - 79... What's up with that?

.

I approve of this.

29/12/2010 10:31 PMPosted by Ione

not sugesting win trading

But thats exactly what you're doing.

Here I was for once happy with Alliance and Horde utterly screwing each other over, but it just had to be ruined didn't it.

Maybe it is, maybe it is. But seriously, who didn't see this coming?

For this to actually work, members of both factions are going to have to make sure they queue regardless of whether they are attacking or defending. Since they removed tenacity, the numbers in Tol Barad must be even. There will be no point in so called 'win trading' if only 5 alliance turn up to defend therefore enabling only 5 horde to attack and vice versa. This is already falling flat on most realms due to people not signing up to defend

Horde keep your whelps with you that are defending ;/

31/12/2010 2:17 PMPosted by Slaktare

For this to actually work, members of both factions are going to have to make sure they queue regardless of whether they are attacking or defending. Since they removed tenacity, the numbers in Tol Barad must be even. There will be no point in so called 'win trading' if only 5 alliance turn up to defend therefore enabling only 5 horde to attack and vice versa. This is already falling flat on most realms due to people not signing up to defend

Protip: Being out of the raid group doesn't exclude you from the honor gain.

As much good as 1800 honor is, i'd rather work for it by crushing alliance skulls than just joining and standing round with my thumb up my arse.

I agree with Banz, 1800 honor Is nice, but I sure as hell will not lose on purpose, doing so would greatly damage the enjoyment of the game for the people who want to have serious Tol barad matches.

Personally I hope they add punishments for anyone who is caught doing this, a ban from the instance would be nice.

not saying win trading is right...

but tol barad is seriously badly designed. Its making the most of a bad situation.

Ade

interesting

Can alliance start showing up for defense seriously why are you guys being so freaking cheap?
Everytime its tol barad theres only around 20 allies showing up fkin upp for horde when we need to attack ive missed the points from tol barad 7 times in row and its not cool at all.
Maybe this sound like a bad qq but im sure there alot of horde feeling the same way. Everytime horde defends its always around 50 or more horde around what would alliance sey if hordes starts bailing on showing up for defense?

can alliance start showing up...horde defended it twice thismorning...you need to make more people aware on the horde that were "trading" as its suppost to be us to you to us etc.