Topic
Is it weird that I find Warriors OP?
|
Maybe its cause I'm a moonkin.. anyways, I find Warriors really hard to defeat, especially in Arena. I have fought with 2x Warriors in Arena and got literally nuked on a few seconds.. Maybe Warriors suck when it comes on 2v2, 3v3, 5v5 etc. but they are great at 1v1
thanks |
|
Edited by Memur on 21/02/12 19:39 (UTC)
no they aren't. yes it is weird.
|
|
I hate trolls.
|
|
|
Well it's hard to tell, some people are just terrible at pvp and get owned by warriors in duels and then cry that they are op.
|
|
So you played against two warriors alone and you say they are good at 1 vs 1 ?
The problem here is only moonkins sucks against warriors that all. |
|
Edited by Nimoz on 21/02/12 20:14 (UTC)
Unfortunately we're not great at 1v1 or anything else at that matter. We're a little bit effective against classes which can't abuse our mobility (But still not, we can't notice any damage against Blood DK's). Such as mages, we can't even touch them. A good boomkin can own a warrior up with closed eyes, just use Nature's Grasp and you'll root the warrior instantly 3 times, during these three roots, you can cast 3 long-casting spells without having anyone interrupting you, and that will significantly damage him.
I don't know if you're trolling or not, but warriors are the weakest class at the moment. It's when threads like this are being created, a class is being nerfed, because Blizzard listens to the "beginners" suprisely. If we cry about us being bad nothing happens though.. hm. I have no idea, all this with warriors are just confusing at the moment. |
|
Not this crap about mages again... We pwn mages rather much if you don't make the mistakes of charging in the first thing you do.
As for the druid talking about OP'ed warriors... We're not OP'ed. All classes has their counters, and you seems to have met yours. |
|
|
Not this crap about mages again... We pwn mages rather much if you don't make the mistakes of charging in the first thing you do. I don't wanna sound rude or anything, but as I see you haven't passed 1500 rating on your warrior in any bracket, therefore I wonder, have you ever met any skilled mage at 2k+ rating? You can't beat them, sorry. |
|
|
Edited by Cìd on 22/02/12 09:30 (UTC)
Sure, there are quite a few GOOD mages out there. I have yet to meet them however, since the people I've met so far think they can just faceroll me with one button.
|
|
So you played against two warriors alone and you say they are good at 1 vs 1 ? Not true.. Shadowpriests sucks to againts warriors! |
1 - 5 at 96 Rating. I sense some big plays are coming here. They probably can faceroll you with one button. |
|
|
Bah, I force them to move around a lot, never stand still long enough to cast a more powerful spell. Even if they do, spell reflect up and bye bye to half their health if they fail to notice the big shiny shield.
And arena rating isn't all, laddie. They venture outside the arenas too. |
|
|
So I can't post my opinion and some tactics about and for the Warrior class, when I myself am playing said Warrior class? Really sound logic there.
|
|
You sure can state your opinions, but you are making it sound like any warrior should be easily defeating a mage, which is simply wrong. Just because you killed a 8 yr old kid playing a mage does not mean that warriors own mages.
|
|
|
Cid, you honestly don't know what you're talking about. If two people, one warrior and one mage, which has the same skill level will duel eachother, the warrior can approximately get him down to 80% HP. If you would happen to get him down to 30%, he iceblock, blink away, freeze you for 10 seconds, evacation to 100% HP, finish you off with an instant icelance for 25-30k crits.
Sorry man.. as told above I don't wanna sound rude. But this clearly states that you know nothing, atleast about mages. |
|
Not exactly although
|
