Topic
Only 3% of players at 2200 are warriors?
|
|
http://www.arenastats.com/index.php?r=all&bg=all&br=2&mr=2200&mt=any&mg=20
|
|
Edited by Destroyerowl on 01/03/12 13:50 (GMT)
why do you concern yourself with the 2200+ ratings, when you will never go above 1900?
jussayin bro |
|
|
For a guy who's in the guild "Cause We Can" you seem really pessimistic. Irony ftw I suppose.
Personally I don't really care if warrior representation is low, just means I have to work a little bit harder, that's all. Warriors aren't bad right now, the main problem is that players above a certain rating knows how to counter warrior mechanics, that's all. |
This. People don't understand this. They just look at these stats and think the class is broken or unplayable. You don't really have a problem until 2 - 2.2k+ so this is not a valid excuse, if you're under that then read some forums/watch some videos and try to get better at your class instead of complaining about warriors state. |
|
|
|
Warriors aren't bad right now, the main problem is that players above a certain rating knows how to counter warrior mechanics, that's all. ... Warrior mechanics are so outdated the class is a joke. Warrior gameplay is like: Charge, DOINGZ DMG!!!, oh snap, they attack me?! HEAL POPED! i'm still dead?! SHIELD WALL!! DOING NO DMG FOR 20 HOURS! The warrior class needs a complete overhaul. Its gameplay is tunnel mode, no complications, and whenever you are forced defensive it's useless, completely useless. |
|
|
A warrior needs to be kept mobile, that's all. Quicks dispells are needed for a warrior to put out the pressure they are capable of causing.
|
|
|
Edited by Ðarkist on 01/03/12 18:31 (GMT)
why do you concern yourself with the 2200+ ratings, when you will never go above 1900? ive been above 1900? trying to find 2k+i players on my server a nightmare moving soon. I concern myself with it as im moving server and pushing 2.2k |
|
|
Edited by Kayer on 01/03/12 18:39 (GMT)
Warriors aren't bad right now, the main problem is that players above a certain rating knows how to counter warrior mechanics, that's all. Yeah, our mechanics are really outdated, and we need a bit of an overhaul - But that being said, I'd obviously like to keep some things the way they are, to be able to recognize the class I'm playing. We have simple mechanics, which is a bit sad, considering that we had so much more back in wrath compared to now. I'd like warriors to be a bit more difficult to master, but it doesn't look like it's going to happen anytime soon. Warriors aren't bad right now, the main problem is that players above a certain rating knows how to counter warrior mechanics, that's all. No, it means we're depending on quick dispells in order to stick on whatever we're trying to stick on. The reason Cart is 2600 as dispellcleave is because he's able to put out tremendous pressure, because he gets the dispells to allow him to stick on something. And he obviously has BiS PvE-gear as well. why do you concern yourself with the 2200+ ratings, when you will never go above 1900? What he means is; Have you been 1900 this season? I checked your statistics, and the highest you've been is 1937, and I'm assuming it's not this season. |
|
|
Warrior gameplay is like: Charge, DOINGZ DMG!!!, oh snap, they attack me?! HEAL POPED! i'm still dead?! SHIELD WALL!! DOING NO DMG FOR 20 HOURS!. ROFOLFORL kinda true though |
|
|
evidently all warriors need to l2p. unfortunately, other classes need to l2p less
|
|
Edited by Kensin on 02/03/12 10:27 (GMT)
I kinda lost interest after they changed the stance dancing stuff in PvP, that's what I really enjoyed when playing the class :/ In turn turning us into a little bit like the guy above having a rage attack and typing in caps was saying, charge derp derp |
|
|
Haha, true that.. And with MoP Berserker Stance will become a AoE-stance, which I'm not really a fan of. :/ |
|
|
i've read way too many comments over the years, especially after the addition of DKs, on how stances are an outdated, punishing, and clunky mechanic, cant please everyone it seems
i guess some people will also complain once the shield requirements on wall & sr will get removed |
|
Edited by Valraujk on 02/03/12 11:41 (GMT)
Everyone who says warriors are NOT bad in these days does simply not understand what fair pvp means.
So are we forced to get super hardcore pve junkys to be atleast viable in arena? cool story bro. I spoke with a friend of mine multiple r1 gladiator. he said warriors are more Up then restro druieds these days. so...
u are 23 and worgen. justsayinbro |
|
Edited by Soiran on 02/03/12 11:46 (GMT)
My biggest wish as a warrior is to get Intercept back. It felt so awesome to just Charge in, "target gets away". You switch to Zerg Stance and Intercept that douche, and then "Throwdown" and PEWPEW.
And really having Charge,Intercept and Heroic Leap as a warrior wouldn't really hurt the PvP balance atm. And it would not hurt PvE at all. Don't get it why the fu** did they remove Intercept? Like please Blizzard... Warriors got really lack of cc's and they are easy kite able. Give us Intercept back. Then we would probably do something else than just train one target in arena until we win or lose... |
He didn't say they are simply not bad, he explained himself in the following sentence, if you cannot read a whole sentence, maybe you should go back to reading penguin books. So are we forced to get super hardcore pve junkys to be atleast viable in arena? cool story He never said it was forced? Back in TBC actually a lot more people were using PvE stuff, this is something new to you? Well, good morning sunshine.
Yeah and my grandpa, (multiple rank1 warrior) argues otherwise cool story bro.
By that retarded logic, you are a deathknight, wtf you doing here? |
I spoke with a friend of mine multiple r1 gladiator. he said warriors are more Up then restro druieds these days. My dad also always said i was the strongest person in the world when i was like 5 years. |
