Prioritise, such a nice word. Let's wait for another 2 milion subs to drop, we'll see what "priority" will Blizz have then... :-)
Yup, because not balancing around 1on1/2on2 primarily is the reason for most sub losses.
Duh. Look at the recent quarter losses, you can clearly see where the issues are at. And pvp is not a big part of it
When something is close to impossible with how they want to balance things, then prioritising things are necessary.
Hell, I don't agree with what blizzard wants to do, I want either 1 spec is balanced for pvp while other is pve. (Different for hybrids ofc) or just abilities working differently in pvp/pve. They don't want too and I do think it's their job to work something out, and they're on a good way with that with the new stats Power and Defense.
But look, a spec needs to be balanced for
utility/buffs/whatever so you dont need the "perfect" setup for 10mans to be viable
You name it
Prioritising the most favored aspects and then attempt to work things out eventually is basically necessary. Otherwise it'd be a big !@#$ing mess
Things can't just be "JUST DO IT"
I can trust you on that. But tell me, why is it better to destroy warriors in top tier game, then mages?
That doesn't make any sense, if they're on par with alot of the other melee's then the warrior should be buffed. Not the mage get nerfed. Common sense brah.
Kensin and swagger are the same person btw, he got banned from the forums on his druid, he just likes to start flame wars ignore him.
Did you read one of my other posts here, about how I like to make fun of people claiming things without having any clue about the facts.