|
|
Edited by Kurgul on 07/07/12 19:20 (BST)
Hard to say, would the God of Death have any power over the Scourge, and if so, more than the Lich King?
I'll vote for the Scorge, if only because I'm tired of these Lovecraft Lite guys hijacking the Big Bad position from the Burning Legion every time I turn my back. Edit: Gnolls VS Quilboars! |
|
Edited by Flamesinger on 07/07/12 20:02 (BST)
Yogg-Saron, Old God; insta-pwn. Unless you mean in his weakened state in Ulduar, then still Yogg-Saron.
Quilboars, more intelligent and bigger armies. Malfurion, strongest Druid and strongest of the brothers. C'thun vs N'zoth (Don't just say C'thun because he was in level 60 content, as Old Gods are, in Lore, as equal in strength as each other (Apparently)). |
C'thun vs N'zoth Since we've never really witnessed what N'zoth looks like or what the true extent of his powers are we can't really be sure who'd win in that conflict. There's also the fact that since Old Gods are all the same, with the same goals and ambitions why would they want to attack eachother? it would only spell certain doom for them as a whole. Tyrande vs Maiev. |
|
|
Edited by Almara on 07/07/12 22:41 (BST)
Kil jaeden replaced Archimonde....
Ill say Archimonde Orcs vs Humans? |
KJ replaced sageras as supreme commander of Burning Legion. and id say humans because what they lack in stregth compared to the orcs they make up for by being master tactitions |
|
Well I would say that the theory of Orcs vs Humans is debateable.
If one side was more powerful than the other then there wouldn't be any modern conflict between the Horde and the Alliance right now. Well it's true orcs do tend to surpass most humans in terms of physical strength, that doesn't necessarily mean they're all brawn and no brains. Orcs are certainly very skilled at tactical manuevering aswell as matching it up with their strength. However as we seen at the battle of Blackrock Spire, when Anduin Lothar was slain by Orgrim Doomhammer, humans are very capable of using their almost unbreakable spirit to turn the tides of battle. Varian vs Garrosh |
|
Edited by Júice on 07/07/12 23:15 (BST)
Aegwynn. However I don't think she would be willing to hurt her only child unless she knew that he was cursed with the spirit of Sargeras inside of him.
But she also managed to defeat the Avatar of Sargeras, granted it was only a portion of his true power it's still an incredible feat of strength on Aegwynn's part. Orgrim Doomhammer vs Gul'dan |
|
I would love to say Ogrimm because Gul'dan is a A-hole but i think Guldan would have some sinister trick up his sleave to give him an unfair advantage, although in a truly honorable and fair fight i think Ogrimm would Pwn Face!
Ragnaros VS Neptulon |
|
Edited by Moontree on 07/07/12 23:58 (BST)
Ragnaros.
Think it was said that Ragnaros was the strongest of the elemental lords. But i bed alot will depend in what elemental plain they would fight or where in the world. Ner'zhul vs Medivh |
|
Medivh.
Nations now! Ironforge vs Stormwind. ... Did you really expect me to ask anything different? |
|
Well I doubt the Dwarves would ever do anything to hurt the relations with the humans since they are such good friends. But then again Humans can be buttholes at times and if such a thing ever REALLY ticked off the dwarves (Who are known to be quite stubborn and full of pride) then I would say that in the unlikely scenario that humans and dwarves faced off...
I would have to go with Dwarves for these main reasons: Dwarves are stouter and are by far physically stronger than the average human. Dwarves have seige weaponry and other war machines created by the gnomes. Dwarves live in a harsher climate than humans making them all the more hardy. Dwarves also have gryphons meaning they would dominate in a sky battle. Dwarves are just more epic in humans in most regards. |
|
|
Edited by Malizïa on 08/07/12 01:13 (BST)
Medivh. That'd be a stalemate, assuming each of the factions both had level headed and capable commanders. Humans have superior numbers & resources as well as superior mobility than the dwarves and can outmanouver them in the field. But the humans could not defeat the dwarves because they wouldn't be able to penetrate the dwarven strongholds in the mountains. It would take Stormwind at least 100 to 600 years of war to defeat the dwarves, perhaps even more. The war would include the humans conquering and claiming all of the surface world & expanding, beating the dwarves in a war of attrition and resilience. |
|
|
Quite certain a Vindicator's just the Draenei Paladin equivalent of an Orc Grunt, whereas a Blademaster is one of those incredibly infuriating people who can cut off all your limbs, sever your head from your neck and hollow out your torso and use it for a birdbath before you've drawn your sword from its scabbard, i.e. waaay above a Grunt/Vindicator in terms of badassery and general fighting ability. In short: Blademaster walks away from a regiment of dead Vindicators counting their stolen lunchmoney. Wildhammer Dwarfs VS Dragonmaw Orcs (both riding on flying mounts)! |
|
|
Orc Blademaster vs Draenei Vindicator ? Oh now that is a really good one. Hmmm, I think there are too many variables and not enough examples to state for sure who would win in such a conflict, as Blademasters are somewhat of a rarity in Orcish society, as not many orcs meet the standards to become full Blademasters, however those who do are held in very high regard and considered quite honourable. Draenei Vindicators on the other hand are pretty much the same, honoured and held dear within Draenei society for what they do and what they represent. Unlike Orcish Blademasters, Draenei Vindicators are essentially walking tanks, with their armour and physical strength. Orcs are more prone to allow their rage to take over and allows them to do incredible feats of strength in combat. Whereas Draenei are more calm, passive and aren't really prone to agression, they like to fight with a cool head, thinking conflicts out in a tactical manner. Blademasters tend not to wear a lot of heavy armour, in fact the less armour the better as it means they are more flexible in combat aswell as strong. Vindicators wear lots of plate armour and carry massive two handed crystal hammers, meaning they would be slow but almost invulnerable. In the end though I would say such a fight would most likely end in a draw, either both sides agree that the other is of the same calibre as them and allow each other to leave with their lifes and a new found sense of pride. Or they would simply both deal killing blows and perish right then and there at the same time, a true warriors death and quite frankly an epic battle to watch. |
|
|
Wildhammer Dwarfs VS Dragonmaw Orcs (both riding on flying mounts)! If this was a sky battle, then I would say the Dragonmaw have the advantage, although a group of Gryphon riders could easily gang up and take down a dragon and it's master. A dragon is simply far more deadly and powerful than a gryphon is. If it doesn't take out a gryphon with its fire then it would surely tear it to pieces with it's massive teeth and claws. Fire Mage vs A Frost Death Knight. |
