Topic Shaman tanks? are you nuts?
Jespur
Emerald Dream
Jespur
89 Dwarf Shaman
7375


Shamanistic rage started to reduce damage only in cataclysm, before cata it was the mana regen ability on enha shamans, since there was no automatic enha specialization for mana regains. It was almost identical to Primal Wisdom but much more powerful since it was a cooldown.
PLEASE get your facts right if you're gonna whine.

Shamanstic rage reduced damage in wotlk aswell so please get your facts right.
Notchfizzle
Azjol-Nerub
Notchfizzle
32 Goblin Shaman
120
See, this is why I would never spec into Enhance, lol. People arguing about what they want, blizz mixing and messing up the spec so much. Give me a straight spec with a clear, defined role any day. I'm sticking to my ele. :)
Raiju
Quel'Thalas
Raiju
90 Goblin Shaman
12645
Edited by Raiju on 10/07/12 18:09 (BST)
10/07/2012 17:27Posted by Notchfizzle
See, this is why I would never spec into Enhance, lol. People arguing about what they want, blizz mixing and messing up the spec so much. Give me a straight spec with a clear, defined role any day. I'm sticking to my ele. :)


Here you go:

Enhance is a dual wielding DPS that mixes melee and elemental attacks.

Defined, clear, straight. Just because people want the spec to be other/older things doesn't mean it is or is going to be. Enhance has been the above since TBC released without failure, the only issue is the constant inclusion of abilities that seem tanky (threat increase?)
Notchfizzle
Azjol-Nerub
Notchfizzle
32 Goblin Shaman
120
10/07/2012 18:09Posted by Raiju
See, this is why I would never spec into Enhance, lol. People arguing about what they want, blizz mixing and messing up the spec so much. Give me a straight spec with a clear, defined role any day. I'm sticking to my ele. :)

the only issue is the constant inclusion of abilities that seem tanky (threat increase?)


Exactly. This is what I mean. Also arguments and theories like this put me off ever rolling enhance spec. Then again, I enjoy casters the most so obviously that'd play a roll too.

You'll know if bliz plan on making Shaman tanks if they give them the ability to wear plate. Hell, if they start making Shaman tanks, why not hunters...or priests? When I play a dungeon everyone wants to play at tank and it seems everyone wants their class to tank too. I hope no one takes offence at this, but just learn to enjoy what you have. If you don't, the class isn't for you. Simple as.
Masztaar
Frostwhisper
Masztaar
90 Tauren Shaman
14565
Rockbiter weapon used to be an imbue that simply increased the weapons DPS by a solid amount. Not for tanking.

Toughness has always been there for PvP, although it did not get revamped like other classes Toughnesses that increase armor.

Lightning shield does damage when we receive damage, or by talents and stuff, if we dont have anything to significantly increase our threat, it's not good for agro. Also if I remember correctly lightning shield proc damage generates no threat.

Shamanistic rage started to reduce damage only in cataclysm, before cata it was the mana regen ability on enha shamans, since there was no automatic enha specialization for mana regains. It was almost identical to Primal Wisdom but much more powerful since it was a cooldown.

Stoneclaw totem was a leveling totem in the old days, because questing was much harder in vanilla and tbc the stoneclaw totem was critical in certain situations. And since glyphs were introduced stoneclaw totem has been an pvp bubble.

PLEASE get your facts right if you're gonna whine.


Aside from the fact that shamanistic rage always worked as a damage reduction ability, this post is the truth.
Rockbiter had nothing to do with threat from the beginning. Lightning shield has never given any significant threat, toughness has stayed the same. When you people claim that Enhance has a few "tanking abilities" and therefore "must have been meant to be tanks in the future", I'd very much like to hear who told you that. Infact, when my guild in vanilla first killed the twin emperors we used a warlock to tank the caster (Vek'lor I think it was?), so warlocks should feel entitled to a tank spec aswell? Just get over it.

I'd like to rephrase this:

10/07/2012 19:02Posted by Notchfizzle
I hope no one takes offence at this, but just learn to enjoy what you have. If you don't, the class isn't for you. Simple as.


to:

"If you don't like the playstyle of your class, then switch to another."

Enhancement is Enhancement, I love Enhancement. I want the issues that ruin Enhancement's intended playstyle to be taken care of, I don't want new issues, and I sure as hell don't want devs to put their efforts on something completely different if they are going to look into my class.
Avatena
Frostmane
Avatena
85 Worgen Druid
2505
10/07/2012 19:02Posted by Notchfizzle
You'll know if bliz plan on making Shaman tanks if they give them the ability to wear plate. Hell, if they start making Shaman tanks, why not hunters...or priests? When I play a dungeon everyone wants to play at tank and it seems everyone wants their class to tank too. I hope no one takes offence at this, but just learn to enjoy what you have. If you don't, the class isn't for you. Simple as.


In vanilla shaman was plan to be tanks, in the beta they where tank able class and they dont need plate to be tanks, mail is good as it is, like druids using leather and a bear form, shaman could use a stone elemental form for tanking.
Besides some people love there shaman (I do) but I also love tanking and the reason to why I think they should be able to tank is that shaman was tankable in vanilla and they got some tanking abilitys for it aswell.
Just commen people that ignore the facts that shaman can be tanks.
Notchfizzle
Azjol-Nerub
Notchfizzle
32 Goblin Shaman
120
and as I mentioned before the Druid tank is anything but the best tank. Especially at lower levels. In my opinion there should be three tank classes. Warrior, Pally and DK. As I said though so long as they don't touch ele I couldn't care less.
Dreoh
Stormscale
Dreoh
90 Tauren Shaman
5515

They cant make shamans tanks, it doesnt fit into the lore..

Therazane gave shamans the gift of tanking :D.
Masztaar
Frostwhisper
Masztaar
90 Tauren Shaman
14565
11/07/2012 01:10Posted by Avatena
Just commen people that ignore the facts that shaman can be tanks.


Oh yeah, right. Your statement about that is obviously backed up by stacks of paperwork. I can tell you that the only ones wanting shamans to tank - or at least think it should be some kind of priority right now, are infact "common" people, and not the ones that dedicate real time and effort into the class.
Ezelis
Grim Batol
Ezelis
86 Draenei Shaman
5280
Edited by Ezelis on 11/07/12 14:12 (BST)

They cant make shamans tanks, it doesnt fit into the lore..

Therazane gave shamans the gift of tanking :D.


After offing her sister *and* doing her work for her with reassembling the world pillar, she *owes* us that much. =p

11/07/2012 11:32Posted by Masztaar
Just commen people that ignore the facts that shaman can be tanks.


Oh yeah, right. Your statement about that is obviously backed up by stacks of paperwork. I can tell you that the only ones wanting shamans to tank - or at least think it should be some kind of priority right now, are infact "common" people, and not the ones that dedicate real time and effort into the class.


I have played shaman since I started playing WoW, my original main is a shaman, and I make a shaman main on every new server I go on.

I don't have *anything* against getting a tank spec, and what annoys me is that people are whining about it because of either the idea that they'd have to ruin one of the preexisting specs just to make a tanking one or that it's "not in the lore".

First of all, where in the lore does it say that shamans *can't* use their powers for defense? Second, in MoP druids get 4 specs, why not add a tanking spec for us too?
Avatena
Frostmane
Avatena
85 Worgen Druid
2505
Edited by Avatena on 11/07/12 14:34 (BST)
11/07/2012 14:05Posted by Ezelis
in MoP druids get 4 specs, why not add a tanking spec for us too?


This!!

Yes that should be made, because every class that can be tanks should be, then we will get some new playstyle classes to try out.

Shaman tank

Warlock tank
Vesha
Bronze Dragonflight
Vesha
90 Pandaren Shaman
10590
Nope. Masztaar and Solex have already posted many many constructive responses for why and Blizzard have said they wont do it for mists so theres no need for anymore 2h or tank specs till the end of MoP.
Masztaar
Frostwhisper
Masztaar
90 Tauren Shaman
14565
Edited by Masztaar on 11/07/12 20:07 (BST)
11/07/2012 14:05Posted by Ezelis
I have played shaman since I started playing WoW, my original main is a shaman, and I make a shaman main on every new server I go on.


So in that statement I can gather the following:
1: You have plenty of shamans.
2: You have started playing WoW at some point, when is unclear.
3: You post on a shaman stacked with green gear, that has a grand total of 76 achievements, give or take 1-2.
4: You make a new shaman main on every server you go on, no warning signals go off for any serious players on that note.

There is a pattern forming above. I'm not much for lore (although I'm by no means uninterested in the story), my reason for not wanting a 4th spec dedicated to tanking is as follows:

1: They are having trouble tuning the specs we already have, and Enhancement recieves very little attention.
2: They are already adding a new tank class in MoP.
3: The fact that so many threads show up about this subject when MoP is close on the horizon, tells me that this class is plagued by alot of players that I would call "overly casual". That meaning that you haven't experienced the painfulness of playing Enhancement in PVE raiding, or both Enhance/Elemental in rated PvP on live. If you had, then this would be a fart in space on your list of concerns.

EDIT:
11/07/2012 14:45Posted by Vesha
Nope. Masztaar and Solex have already posted many many constructive responses for why and Blizzard have said they wont do it for mists so theres no need for anymore 2h or tank specs till the end of MoP.

Thank you, and agreed.
Raiju
Quel'Thalas
Raiju
90 Goblin Shaman
12645

Therazane gave shamans the gift of tanking :D.


After offing her sister *and* doing her work for her with reassembling the world pillar, she *owes* us that much. =p


I could get into a huge lore discussion about how Therazane really doesn't care (the only reason she doesn't kill you on the spot is because you have proved helpful to her more patient sons) at all what you did, as long as you leave and preferably take the twilights hammer with you. We are the invaders in deepholm, a place that is in a way sacred, the first interaction anyone had on a physical level corrupted the land and binded the elementals to twilight cult will.

I have played shaman since I started playing WoW, my original main is a shaman,
Most people on these forums main shaman or show interest in it. A lot of them started with shaman as their main.
and I make a shaman main on every new server I go on.


Reroll so much why?

I don't have *anything* against getting a tank spec, and what annoys me is that people are whining about it because of either the idea that they'd have to ruin one of the preexisting specs just to make a tanking one or that it's "not in the lore".


These arguments are bad yes, but it is true that adding a 4th spec to a class with a history of being underdeveloped is hardly a good idea. IF Blizzard turned around and gave more attention to shamans as a class then it'd be the perfect time for them to implement possibly both 2h viability (not sure how it would work within the enhance spec anymore), and a tanking tree. Before then it's not worth asking for - this is coming from someone who has played shaman for years, tested and minmaxed, enhance etc. in the past (not anymore) who would love shaman tanks.

First of all, where in the lore does it say that shamans *can't* use their powers for defense? Second, in MoP druids get 4 specs, why not add a tanking spec for us too?


There is no lore argument against shaman tanks, or in fact most tanks. I told that to the OP in my first response(s).
Kneecrusher
Argent Dawn
Kneecrusher
85 Goblin Warrior
7425
Edited by Kneecrusher on 12/07/12 08:46 (BST)
>Mixing game mechanics with lore

Are you stupid or just pretending?
Remove ability to use holy spells to undead priests, it doesn't fit into lore!
Ragarr
Darkmoon Faire
Ragarr
72 Orc Shaman
5340
anyone who agrees about shaman tanking visit this thread!

http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/4210106962?page=4
Olympica
Frostmane
Olympica
82 Blood Elf Paladin
800
Edited by Caestra on 14/07/12 18:43 (BST)
12/07/2012 14:17Posted by Ragarr
anyone who agrees about shaman tanking visit this thread!


Justicer´s thread about shaman tanking is alot more worked out then that thread, those who agree on shaman tanking, should visit his thread instead.

Here it is:
http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/3129453760
Masztaar
Frostwhisper
Masztaar
90 Tauren Shaman
14565
Edited by Masztaar on 13/07/12 10:06 (BST)
Argh, can we please move away from this topic until the MoP release at least? It's just not serving any purpose at the moment.
Adnachiel
Nagrand
Adnachiel
90 Pandaren Shaman
13220
Where is Solex with his well-written replies as to why Shaman tanks are a stupid idea... /cry

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Click here to view the Forums Code of Conduct.

Report Post # written by
Reason
Explain (256 characters max)

Reported!

[Close]