Topic
Mouseover-else-target taunt macro
|
|
Hello. I just returned to the game after about a year, but my paladin taunt mouseover macros are not working as intended anymore. The point of the macro was to taunt mouseover targets, then taunt targets if there is no mouseover target. It still works on mouseover, but it doen't work if I don't have a mouseover but have a target selected; it tells me "you have no target". The macro is:
/cast [@mouseover, nodead] [Target] Hand of Reckoning I use the same for Righteous Defense as well, and it also is not working. After a little searching around, I tried: /cast [@mouseover] [] Hand of Reckoning and /cast [target=mouseover] Hand of Reckoning; [nodead] Hand of Reckoning But I am still having the same problem with all of them. Any help? |
|
|
Edited by Knarko on 29/07/12 20:15 (BST)
/use [@mouseover,harm,nodead][]Hand of Reckoning
|
|
|
Thanks a lot, that worked :) also for the righteous defense macro, I removed the "harm" so that it could work properly :)
|
|
|
Edited by Khás on 29/07/12 22:13 (BST)
Actually it's working perfectly for Hand of Reckoning, but I still have the same problem with Righteous Defense for some weird reason. As I said earlier I removed the "harm" from the syntax when I copied it for Righteous Defense so that it can work on both friendly targets and hostiles attacking friendly targets, and the mouseover functionality is working perfectly, but for some odd reason it's not working for normal targets, hostile or friendly, even though I kept the empty bracket!
Any ideas? :) |
|
|
Edited by Zhell on 29/07/12 22:30 (BST)
Replace 'harm' with 'exists' instead of removing it altogether.
|
|
|
Ok check this out, I added the "harm" back, and it's now working for friendly and hostile targets, as well as hostile mouseover, but it stopped working on friendly mouseover (as expected). How do i fix this?
|
|
|
OK I just found this and it works like magic:
/cast [target= mouseover, exists][] Righteous Defense Thanks a lot :D |
|
|
Thank Zhell, I didn't see your post before, you are right :) thank you :)
|
