Topic Ragnaros mount 100% drop?
Saphiramoon
Tarren Mill
Saphiramoon
90 Blood Elf Priest
14540
I see so many of those mounts running around these days, that it really holds not much value. I got mine in an openraid group that went there for 10 weeks for each of us, so not that hard. The raid leader started selling the mount after all of us got it - and we did basically 9 man raggy since the buyer died on the first set of seeds - so, again, does it really show anything anymore to have it? It stopped being a prestige item a long time ago, it's just a "fad of the day" thing now, since people still fret over it. Wait for 6 months, and you wont see them spammed everywhere anymore.

I'd have understood the uproar if Raggy hc was still a "prestige" thing. But after 5.0, I went there with a guild group, out of which half hadnt seen raggy hc, and we killed him in 5 minutes. The dmg was so high, he only got 2 traps, one set of seeds per phase and no meteor at all, basically removing a great deal from p4, since you needed to kite around/trap it. Dreadflames spawned and the boss died 10 seconds after, so even that was trivial. I know it was nerfed to hell even before 5.0, but that..I don't think I want to see raggy hc again now. I cant even imagine how he is on normal, if he's that on hc.

So, for me, the fact that there are a couple hundreds of them more running around makes no difference. So some players are happy running around now with a flaming chicken, obtained via a normal run, ontop of the hordes of ones that just bought it. It doesnt take away anything from me. It's just the "end of season" sales, everything thats not current fashion anymore given out for pennies.
Monkylord
Draenor
Monkylord
90 Troll Hunter
15660
Edited by Monkylord on 05/09/12 08:25 (BST)
05/09/2012 06:18Posted by Zazkya
99% of people were clearly aware it was most likely a bug and saw no issue with doing it anyway. no one else view this mentality as a problem?


Pure speculation, and if not then it's prejudice.


All of us saw the trade spam on monday night. We know that almost no one was doing FL anymore and all of the sudden 7-8 runs at the same time...

Just admit people exploited a known bug to get the mount. Blizzard will not do anything anyway. They are scared to loose their precious bovines.

05/09/2012 07:46Posted by Saphiramoon
I'd have understood the uproar if Raggy hc was still a "prestige" thing. But after 5.0, I went there with a guild group, out of which half hadnt seen raggy hc, and we killed him in 5 minutes. The dmg was so high, he only got 2 traps, one set of seeds per phase and no meteor at all, basically removing a great deal from p4, since you needed to kite around/trap it. Dreadflames spawned and the boss died 10 seconds after, so even that was trivial. I know it was nerfed to hell even before 5.0, but that..I don't think I want to see raggy hc again now. I cant even imagine how he is on normal, if he's that on hc.


And we come to the "We consume content too fast" discussion again. Why can't things stay hard and challenging? Why do iconic fights have to be brought down to the level of Hogger?
Zazkya
Nagrand
Zazkya
85 Gnome Mage
1730
05/09/2012 07:58Posted by Monkylord
All of us saw the trade spam on monday night. We know that almost no one was doing FL anymore and all of the sudden 7-8 runs at the same time...


Hm, I don't know about this, so fair enough...I can't fault you there.
Vaneras
Vaneras
Community
05/09/2012 00:43Posted by Ripfrenzy
Fixed as of now.


The droprate was never intended, so it should indeed be fixed by now. Currently it is only the heroic version that guarantees a drop.

05/09/2012 05:27Posted by Lornd
put simply - blizz should clamp down on abuse of bugs / exploits. even if its something as simple as a 24hr ban before a mentality sets in of "oh well lets abuse this since there are no consequences" for example recently in trade you would see spamming FL grps with "OMG RAGGY MOUNT BUGGED DROPPING 100% FROM NORMAL JOIN MY GRP AND LETS FARM IT BEFORE THEY FIX IT" 99% of people were clearly aware it was most likely a bug and saw no issue with doing it anyway. no one else view this mentality as a problem?


We do take exploits very seriously, however getting this mount required no exploitation. The drop rate was a bug though, and even though I am sure some were aware of this, there were also those who didn't know. It is therefore quite unlikely that we will take further action on this, and if we do, it would most likely be something minor like removing the mount from those it shouldn't have dropped for under normal circumstances.
Saphiramoon
Tarren Mill
Saphiramoon
90 Blood Elf Priest
14540
And we come to the "We consume content too fast" discussion again. Why can't things stay hard and challenging? Why do iconic fights be brought down to the level of Hogger?


I've been writing some rivers of text in that thread too, amongst many others defending the old way of keeping some things exclusive.

But what can you do when gear scales rampant and, together with nerfs, allows you to skip entire aspects of the fights? What can you do if you put together this model with a boss that's been up for half the expansion? I really can't see why they needed to nerf a t12 boss again in 5.0, after being nerfed already severely after t12. No point going back to old content? Seems to me thats a bit hypocritical, when you nerf the "popular choice of boss" of the expansion several times a tier after its normal life. For a company so bent on pretending to look only towards the future they sure do milk the !@#$ out of the past when it fits their business model.

So, has the raggy mount been a "fashion statement" for wow players? Alrite boys, toss it in the "1 euro for everything" basket at the end of the expansion. I'm sick an tired seeing the shopping malls sales model into a fantasy game, but what can we do? We live in the times of the facebook/twitter generation, everything works like the mall or it's not cool enough for the trendy masses. And, from my experience, the minute you produce for the masses, you cant keep exclusivity in the equation anymore. Opposed to vanilla/tbc, when wow was a "nerd game", it is now a social product. Its target got too big to allow concentrated detail.

I'll never go to a blizzcon. Rather force my brain to not think about the real intentions behind the game. I'm sometimes considering not reading general forums anymore, I'm sick and tired to hear the mantra "blizzard needs to make money, so that justifies <insert dumb new feature introduced here>". You know those people claiming the spirit healer keeps telling you subliminal messages about "give us your money"? That's bull%^-* compared to the humming on the general forums, and the funny part is, they did it so well, its the players doing all the "subliminal work" now.
Bruceelee
Terenas
Bruceelee
21 Human Paladin
13235
Edited by Bruceelee on 05/09/12 08:40 (BST)
05/09/2012 08:24Posted by Vaneras
We do take exploits very seriously, however getting this mount required no exploitation. The drop rate was a bug though, and even though I am sure some were aware of this, there were also those who didn't know. It is therefore quite unlikely that we will take further action on this, and if we do, it would most likely be something minor like removing the mount from those it shouldn't have dropped for under normal circumstances.

Lol ,there was 100+ Pugs farming FL normal just for that....i'd remove mount from anyone who got it at certain point
Those that would get it in normal enviorment are in lot lower %
Bleargh
Arathi
Bleargh
85 Human Paladin
7010
What if we intended to do FL anyway but were way more motivated when we were aware of the 100% drop rate ?
I don't know how to do "it would most likely be something minor like removing the mount from those it shouldn't have dropped for under normal circumstances."
Ozkorkmaz
Sunstrider
Ozkorkmaz
85 Undead Death Knight
9460
Take mount from them... its fair !!!

No pain No Gain = No heroic No Mount
Monkylord
Draenor
Monkylord
90 Troll Hunter
15660
05/09/2012 08:39Posted by Bleargh
What if we intended to do FL anyway but were way more motivated when we were aware of the 100% drop rate ?


In that case you were exploiting a bug.
Lorcan
Tarren Mill
Lorcan
90 Undead Mage
14570
05/09/2012 08:49Posted by Monkylord
What if we intended to do FL anyway but were way more motivated when we were aware of the 100% drop rate ?


In that case you were exploiting a bug.


Its clearly been stated that's not the case.

Please stop the equine assault.
Nethzul
Draenor
Nethzul
86 Orc Warlock
12890
05/09/2012 08:24Posted by Vaneras
We do take exploits very seriously


Well this is clearly a lie. All those gold sellers exploiting the dupe method and nothing is being done to stop them or fix it.
Luda
Blackhand
Luda
85 Human Mage
13270
,

05/09/2012 08:32Posted by Bruceelee
We do take exploits very seriously, however getting this mount required no exploitation. The drop rate was a bug though, and even though I am sure some were aware of this, there were also those who didn't know. It is therefore quite unlikely that we will take further action on this, and if we do, it would most likely be something minor like removing the mount from those it shouldn't have dropped for under normal circumstances.

Lol ,there was 100+ Pugs farming FL normal just for that....i'd remove mount from anyone who got it at certain point
Those that would get it in normal enviorment are in lot lower %


cry more
Ultradrol
Aggramar
Ultradrol
55 Human Death Knight
0
be serious guys, its a horribly ugly mount, from an out dated raid
who gives a !@#$
Velleity
Moonglade
Velleity
80 Undead Priest
6835
05/09/2012 08:24Posted by Vaneras
I am sure some were aware of this


Everyone was aware of this.

Only a tiny amount of people would've obtained the mount this weekend legitimately rest all used the bug to farm rag normal.

If you remove the mount from everyone who got the mount during this bug then the back-lash would be minimal as most people are guilty as charged.

Double standards and you guys are too lazy to fix this or rather you lack the back-bone to do so as you're afraid of what the casuals (not meant as insult) will do if you take their toys away.

Poor game management, fire whoever is responsible

Over and out.
Metalfighter
Stormscale
Metalfighter
85 Undead Rogue
2925
bollocks

we tried it aint dropping on normal
Solïmano
Shattered Hand
Solïmano
85 Blood Elf Warlock
10610
Players have been exploiting this bug all week to benefit themselves, their guilds, and other players.

And Blizzard Exploitation Policy say: "In an effort to preserve an enjoyable and fair experience for all players, we constantly monitor all World of Warcraft realms for exploitative activity".

The definition of an Exploit.

"An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or design flaw by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers".

In all honesty, it is simple to track who did and who didnt earn the mount. Anyone who earned it in regular from August 28th to September 4th.
Miema
Proudmoore
Miema
1 Goblin Shaman
0
99% of people were clearly aware it was most likely a bug and saw no issue with doing it anyway


Simply? No. I did not Farm the Mount (i had this long before) but i and the most People that i know, did not see any Bug here. We just think'd thats a Feature of the Patch, but for sure not an Bug.
Lorcan
Tarren Mill
Lorcan
90 Undead Mage
14570
Players have been exploiting this bug all week to benefit themselves, their guilds, and other players.

And Blizzard Exploitation Policy say: "In an effort to preserve an enjoyable and fair experience for all players, we constantly monitor all World of Warcraft realms for exploitative activity".

The definition of an Exploit.

"An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or design flaw by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers".

In all honesty, it is simple to track who did and who didnt earn the mount. Anyone who earned it in regular from August 28th to September 4th.


Yes but its much harder to track the groups who WOULD have had a mount drop regardless, with a situation like this statistically speaking bugged or not some of the groups could have had the mount drop.

In terms of an exploit, it really isn't. A bug yes. But to exploit something you have to perform an action out of the ordinary. Considering killing raggy was a normal process blizzard are thus not considering it an exploit.

It doesn't alter the encounter in any way, it doesn't decrease its difficulty , it doesn't bypass phases or mechanics. Its just an oversight by blizzard in the drop rate this patch. Which has now been fixed.
Velleity
Moonglade
Velleity
80 Undead Priest
6835
05/09/2012 10:25Posted by Miema
did not see any Bug here. We just think'd thats a Feature of the Patch, but for sure not an Bug.


A likely story.

Why didn't they make DS normal drop the 1 percent mount 100 percent of the time as well?

Why not do this with Mimirion's head or invincible too?

As has been said before, when LFR exploits and such were happening it's the same people who are now keeping quiet and saying it's just a game that got loads of guilds banned cause it was apparently unfair to the average wow player.
Lorcan
Tarren Mill
Lorcan
90 Undead Mage
14570
05/09/2012 10:29Posted by Velleity
As has been said before, when LFR exploits and such were happening it's the same people who are now keeping quiet and saying it's just a game that got loads of guilds banned cause it was apparently unfair to the average wow player.


That is a completely different scenario, they were doing something out of the ordinary to avoid the loot mechanics of the LFR.

That was an exploit.

Doing raggy and having the mount drop is not.

Please report any Code of Conduct violations, including:

Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.

Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.

Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.

Click here to view the Forums Code of Conduct.

Report Post # written by
Reason
Explain (256 characters max)

Reported!

[Close]