Get the Desktop App for Battle.net Now
- All your games in 1 place
- Log in once
- Automatic game updates
Hey there :)
I'm just gonna ask Blizzard if there's a chance if they can implend more Character Specific macro slots? - You can easily fill out all the macro slots with focus macros and target macros and then you barely got space to simple ability macros :) What does the folks out there think :)?
Hi there Ímaginarygf,
Devs are looking into revamping the whole macro system at some point, meanwhile, simply increasing the number of slots would probably be good enough. They were having some discussions about doing just that but we still don’t have any concrete plans on the way, if anything changes we’ll let you know.
I'd love it as well. there's no way 18 macros is enough for my rogue, especially not after i created a new UI to track CDs better using macros like this one:
/cast slice and dice
You can get 4 spells in 1 macro if you are up for using shift, ctrl and alt binds, and for obvious reasons that's impossible to do on nearly every bind.
And yes, i am using stuff like "Q = shadowstep, Shift+Q = focus shadowstep, Ctrl+Q = mouseover shadowstep" in one macro.
Putting 2 abilities with a CD on the same macro makes it harder to see the CD though, for instance i have evasion on R, combat readiness on ctrl R and cloak of shadows on shift R. luckily neither of these require a macro, but that's a decent example to having different spells with a CD on the same bind.
Very curious what
revamping the whole macro systemholds for us.
But anyway, I've seen the request for more slots more then once on the forums. I can only say that I welcome more slots too! Especially when you use @arena123 and/or focus macro's, you run out of slots pretty fast.
Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
Posts containing personal information about other players. This includes physical addresses, e-mail addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.